I did my stone tool lesson for three more world history classes. They went well, and no blood loss this time. Most of the students followed along. Not all students were enthralled. I do not know if it's just me not keeping their attention (though, I still have a lot to learn in that department) or if they are just not interested.

Though the majority seemed interested, only a few asked questions. When several questions or comments were made, they were always by the same students.

I'm not sure all of my lessons can be as interactive as this one, though I'd like to try. A big part of this lesson did involve lecture. As much as I'm not a big fan of lecturing, I believe the anecdotes were helpful as I went over the handout ( #8 at my portfolio - http://micksportfolio.yolasite.com/ ).

I find that many my references need to be explained or expanded upon. For some, I have to define "technology". In the simplest terms, a tool. I've had to describe "Lucy" - the Australopithecus afarensis discovered by Donald Johanson in 1974. Only a few have seen the movie "The Gods Must Be Crazy", so it's difficult for them to have a visual reference of a Stone Age culture. So, my lesson will be to find references that are more relevant to 15 year olds.